![]() ![]()
#SLOWEST SONG IN MAGIC TILES 3 UPDATE#I must ask, what are you using to watch and screen cap those videos? I imagine that most people on here would be using MPC-HC + LAVfilters, but I just end up with a blank screen.ĮDIT: Oh, turns out I just needed to update my version of MPC-HC. UPDATE: It does however work great for testing audio/video de-syncing since you can see if the engine revs and gear shifting matches up with the on-screen display in the bottom-right.ĮDIT 2: You can download the VP9 WebM files (along with the h.264 formats) from YouTube with one of the following Firefox extensions: While it has an extremely stable frame rate it's nowhere as visually detailed as the BeamNG video. If you want to test the smoothness and motion performance of VP9 I recommend the following video instead: #SLOWEST SONG IN MAGIC TILES 3 PORTABLE#To test h.264 just open the same link in a browser that doesn't yet support VP9.įor your convenience, here are links to Chrome Portable (supports VP9) Firefox ESR portable (doesn't support VP9):ĮDIT: Due to its alpha state, BeamNG DRIVE is known to have frame rate hiccups. Here's a great example of VP9 on YouTube making the video no longer look like crap ~ UPDATE: I mean for 720p, my internet is too slow to stream 1080p: WebM VP9 (1686kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C () WebM VP9 (2182kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C ()ĭASH AVC (2125kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C ()įmt22 AVC (2894kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C () MP4 AVC (6169kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C ()ĭASH AVC (2112kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C ()įmt22 AVC (2886kbps): Screenshot A () ~ Screenshot B () ~ Screenshot C () I've been doing quite a bit of testing and felt that I should probably link the stuff earlier in the thread. Here's a list of my quality tests from newest to oldest: #SLOWEST SONG IN MAGIC TILES 3 720P#It's important to note however that the higher-quality fmt22 AVC encodes no longer exist - they're now identical to the non-HFR 720p DASH AVC encode (except in a non-DASH container). If I ever get around to making a new test upload or something, I'll probably redo them. Overall however, h264 wins, which i find quite surprising as the settings they use for it it's extremely bad.Ģ016 UPDATE: Sorry, the download and image links are down. ![]() I have also compared the encoding of some videos, and well, they beat each other at different things. VP9 is about 2.5, taken the numbers from my head right now so take it with a grain of salt. Never the less, it's not all 10k videos, just overall, also the bitrate compared to mp4(h264) is less.ġ080p is about 3-4k bitrate with h264 if i remember correctly, How in the world are they able to encode all the videos if VP9 is that slow, even if they only do 10k videos, it's still pretty insane. ![]() No kidding, currently VP9 is so slow it's not practical at all.įun fact though, Youtube have started to use it on Videos as a "Standard", it seems that they encode all popular videos (about 10k views) to VP9 according to my fast research. high bit depth sounds nice (probably it will slow things down even more) Will that be decodable with the default VP9, or will the branch have to merge or something? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |